<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FOS Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fosonline.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fosonline.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating development with conservation: A means to a conservation end, or a mean end to conservation? by Sarah Otterstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.fosonline.org/resource/mean-end-to-conservation/comment-page-1#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Otterstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fosonline.org/?post_type=resources&#038;p=316156#comment-348</guid>
		<description>This is a fine line that conservation NGOs often walk. This article articulated the subtle differences between doing development and doing conservation with development benefits. Results chains explained will be helpful in deciding which community-based programs may be pursued without sacrificing primary conservation goals. Thanks for the tips!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fine line that conservation NGOs often walk. This article articulated the subtle differences between doing development and doing conservation with development benefits. Results chains explained will be helpful in deciding which community-based programs may be pursued without sacrificing primary conservation goals. Thanks for the tips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

